Fox News asked for permission from a citizen - journalist to use his video in their report.

By
Fox News asked for permission from a citizen - journalist to use his video in their report. He said, "No." Fox News then decided to use it anyway.

I'm no lawyer, but isn't that wrong? At least they gave him video credit, but still ...

https://twitter.com/DieRobinsonDie/status/1000950526136258561?s=19
https://twitter.com/FoxNews/status/1000905997391618049?s=19

Comments

Bob Lai said…
I’m familiar with ‘stringers’ (freelance photographers) and ‘eyewitness video’ - if the photographer says ‘no, you cannot use it,’ that’s supposed to be it.
May 30, 2018 at 10:57 AM
Jason ON said…
Would this fall under "fair use" or is Fox's selling advertising considered for-profit on this?
May 30, 2018 at 11:46 AM
Bob Lai said…
It’d only be fair use if the photog had posted it in the public domain. But even then, if they asked and were told no, that should be it.
May 30, 2018 at 1:03 PM
Bodhipaksa said…
“Fair use” with video only applies to things like commentary (e.g. I could use a brief Disney clip if there’s a voice-over discussing animation techniques) or parody. (Disney would probably still threaten to sue, however.) Fox are in breach of copyright law. Technically there are penalties for this, but Fox are no doubt assuming the owner of the film can’t afford to take them to court.
May 30, 2018 at 10:05 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

So, I asked Andrew Tamm, who filled my Stream with a hundred (sarcasm there) animated gifs and cat pictures to...

By
So, I asked Andrew Tamm, who filled my Stream with a hundred (sarcasm there) animated gifs and cat pictures to remove me from whatever Circle he has me in where he posts the animated gifs and cat pictures. It was either that or unfollow him and I didn't see any reason to unfollow him. Me asking https://plus.google.com/112885755521259735422/posts/78dwnvvgh4p <==edited to add the correct link Then he plusses me onto Public posts of animated cat gifs : https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/EuuR1tnU3vJ https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/8r6Grcm2Jpj https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/74PgSu6iL2s Then one of his friends (or Circlers) starts plussing me into posts of animated cat gifs : https://plus.google.com/u/0/107120198886093172821/posts/gRW9JhWLs5T Don't get me wrong, I'm all about sarcasm and messing with people, but this seems sort of childish to me. Am I the only one who thinks so? So far I have only blocked
Read more

I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend.

By
I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend. Why? This stupid #gifwars thing people are so proud of. This Adam Black guy said he doesn't like gifs and now everyone is mass trolling him. Having been mass trolled like this I can relate to him easily enough. Have an opinion and the collective might of Google+'s lower class denizens jump on a bandwagon. I just saw a post where someone wanted to jump on board and had to get clarification she was tagging the proper Adam Black. She wasn't even connected to him ! Nor was she a part of the original discussion. She just wanted to follow the herd. When I called her out of it she claimed, "one gif doesn't make a troll." Perhaps not, but she's contributing to a larger troll effort. One straw doesn't break the camel's back, but thousands will. So, tonight, Google+ disgusts me. It probably will tomorrow as well. And possibly Sunday. I gave up Google+ for two months this spring
Read more