So, why isn't this woman being charged? CNN​, you missed out on the most important part of the story.

By
So, why isn't this woman being charged? CNN​, you missed out on the most important part of the story.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/26/us/colorado-pregnant-woman-attack/index.html

Comments

Emlyn O'Regan said…
Maybe she's going to the loony bin forever?
March 26, 2015 at 10:25 PM
Jason ON said…
Possibly, Emlyn O'Regan​, but the story should have that info in it.
March 26, 2015 at 10:34 PM
Martha Velazquez said…
The article didn't even mention how many months the victim was in her pregnancy. Maybe the baby could've survived if it wasn't butchered out of it's mother..
March 26, 2015 at 10:38 PM
Jason ON said…
Then you're looking at the legal system incorrectly, Liz B​. It's not about what's best for the individual but what's best for society. Is it better that this woman is or there or better that she stand trial? For a heinous crime like this, she needs to charged at the very least.
March 27, 2015 at 4:47 AM
Lewna Tsuki said…
I believe they had to prove that the baby had survived and managed to live on its own, outside of the womb, before they would have been able to press murder charges. If I remember correctly, that's what the law is here in Colorado.
March 27, 2015 at 5:18 AM
Jason ON said…
An article in The Denver Post this morning said it would be difficult to charge this woman for murder because of how Colorado sees fetuses. In short, a fetus isn't it's own human being unless it can be shown to be viable outside the womb on an individual basis. That means, did this fetus survive outside of the woman's womb? Apparently the coroner thought not.

She will probably be charged with a third degree felony, though. Assault, attempted murder, deadly weapon, the whole works.

A press release is scheduled for later today.
March 27, 2015 at 8:42 AM
Jason ON said…
I understand it well enough, Liz B​. If you read my previous post I say pretty much what you're saying here.
March 27, 2015 at 10:07 PM
Jason ON said…
The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.
March 28, 2015 at 11:07 AM
Jason ON said…
Requiring someone to do the right thing isn't "damaging the victim." It's being brave and not allowing someone else to dictate your reaction.
March 31, 2015 at 10:37 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend.

By
I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend. Why? This stupid #gifwars thing people are so proud of. This Adam Black guy said he doesn't like gifs and now everyone is mass trolling him. Having been mass trolled like this I can relate to him easily enough. Have an opinion and the collective might of Google+'s lower class denizens jump on a bandwagon. I just saw a post where someone wanted to jump on board and had to get clarification she was tagging the proper Adam Black. She wasn't even connected to him ! Nor was she a part of the original discussion. She just wanted to follow the herd. When I called her out of it she claimed, "one gif doesn't make a troll." Perhaps not, but she's contributing to a larger troll effort. One straw doesn't break the camel's back, but thousands will. So, tonight, Google+ disgusts me. It probably will tomorrow as well. And possibly Sunday. I gave up Google+ for two months this spring
Read more