I read somewhere that Boehner needs to be tried under the Logan Act for inviting the Israeli Prime Minister to speak.

By
I read somewhere that Boehner needs to be tried under the Logan Act for inviting the Israeli Prime Minister to speak. I tend to agree. And all financial support for the Jewish state needs to be halted indefinitely.
http://mondoweiss.net/2015/03/congresss-netanyahu-explain?utm_source=Mondoweiss+List&utm_campaign=300d0e0a2a-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b86bace129-300d0e0a2a-398517993

Comments

S rodden said…
I strongly disagree ! I listened to his speech it was powerful and a voice that needed to be heard instead of our pussy president who doesn't have the cahoonas to break out of a wet paper sack !

Sorry Jason
March 7, 2015 at 3:42 PM
Jason ON said…
S rodden​ do you even know what the Logan Act is?
March 8, 2015 at 11:30 PM
S rodden said…
Jason ON do you know once an act is signed into law it can't be modified ?

March 9, 2015 at 6:28 AM
Jason ON said…
What does that have to do with whether or not the GOP leadership violated the Logan Act?
March 9, 2015 at 8:02 AM
S rodden said…
Jason ON the president has violated the ACA act time and time again your welcome.

Netanyahu brought some cahoonas to our country and he didn't ride here wearing mom jeans a bicycle helmet and play the democratic pussy routine.

Masculinity drives democrats nuts just sayin !
March 9, 2015 at 8:07 AM
Jason ON said…
Then you have a very narrow view of masculinity and democrats.

And if you missed that day at civics class, the president is charged with enforcing laws. The position has the discretion on how to do so. Obama uses such discretion, as did Bush (II), as did Clinton as did Bush (I) as did Reagan and so forth.

However, you're trying to alter the conversation. Has the Logan Act been modified? Does Netanyahu's speech before congress not violate it?
March 9, 2015 at 9:02 AM
S rodden said…
Jason ON see now you are the one who needs to stop watching CNN ABC NBC. I'm not narrow minded. I'm very masculine in my thinking and I know CNN would gasp right now but masculine thinking and being who you are is ok.

If I were president I wouldn't want a pussy pic of me released so Russia or any country could exploit !

Back to your subject of following law. Missing emails for government officials under investigation could mean prison time because it's a federal offense

Hillary says she wants federal government to release her emails. News flash, Hillary you have your emails YOU release them it's the law that you broke by having a personal server in your house that was used for government business and that's prison time if you are convicted jmo.

Jason no offense I appreciate your commentary from a liberal prospective
March 9, 2015 at 9:12 AM
Jason ON said…
S rodden isn't interested in fact, proof or reality, Stephen Dickson. He's interested in defending the Koch Bros. reality that Fox News breeds.
March 11, 2015 at 1:23 PM
S rodden said…
Jason ON no I don't defend Fox News Koch brothers of I know ZERO about and I don't watch Fox News again you should read my post Jason.

Every news agency has lied, stretched the truth, fabricated hypothesis implying it as truth etc etc.

So if you are that naïve to believe only your news agency is on the up and up and always truthful carry on in what you say as your "non reality " or whatever lol
March 11, 2015 at 8:52 PM
S rodden said…
Stephen Dickson oh ya sorry I was referring to BO with his mom jeans on wearing one of those child looking bicycle helmets riding a bicycle it just sticks in my mind. Not masculine lol.
March 11, 2015 at 8:55 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

So, I asked Andrew Tamm, who filled my Stream with a hundred (sarcasm there) animated gifs and cat pictures to...

By
So, I asked Andrew Tamm, who filled my Stream with a hundred (sarcasm there) animated gifs and cat pictures to remove me from whatever Circle he has me in where he posts the animated gifs and cat pictures. It was either that or unfollow him and I didn't see any reason to unfollow him. Me asking https://plus.google.com/112885755521259735422/posts/78dwnvvgh4p <==edited to add the correct link Then he plusses me onto Public posts of animated cat gifs : https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/EuuR1tnU3vJ https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/8r6Grcm2Jpj https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/74PgSu6iL2s Then one of his friends (or Circlers) starts plussing me into posts of animated cat gifs : https://plus.google.com/u/0/107120198886093172821/posts/gRW9JhWLs5T Don't get me wrong, I'm all about sarcasm and messing with people, but this seems sort of childish to me. Am I the only one who thinks so? So far I have only blocked
Read more

I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend.

By
I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend. Why? This stupid #gifwars thing people are so proud of. This Adam Black guy said he doesn't like gifs and now everyone is mass trolling him. Having been mass trolled like this I can relate to him easily enough. Have an opinion and the collective might of Google+'s lower class denizens jump on a bandwagon. I just saw a post where someone wanted to jump on board and had to get clarification she was tagging the proper Adam Black. She wasn't even connected to him ! Nor was she a part of the original discussion. She just wanted to follow the herd. When I called her out of it she claimed, "one gif doesn't make a troll." Perhaps not, but she's contributing to a larger troll effort. One straw doesn't break the camel's back, but thousands will. So, tonight, Google+ disgusts me. It probably will tomorrow as well. And possibly Sunday. I gave up Google+ for two months this spring
Read more