We can clearly see the Bible Belt on this map, including those states are the bastions of "libertarian" ideologies.

By
We can clearly see the Bible Belt on this map, including those states are the bastions of "libertarian" ideologies. 
http://wapo.st/1NjNTFN

Comments

Bryce Miller said…
""substantially burdening" individuals' exercise of religion"" is not the same as regulating a business. A business is not an individual. Corporations are also not people.
March 28, 2015 at 3:28 PM
James Wilson said…
Businesses or corporations are not people and do not have "religious" rights to hate and discriminate. If you open your doors to the commons, you treat a ll people equally. If you don't like it, don't go in business.
March 28, 2015 at 3:44 PM
Richard Martin said…
America
Your twenty States are a problem . I want Obama to annul these illegal laws . The
Religious Fundamentalists must be brought
before God .  What if pornographers and child
abusers are found in this Group  ? Should they be boycotted ? A transgender person is not a criminal , he is beloved by God .
March 28, 2015 at 4:30 PM
Bryce Miller said…
Richard Martin it's not really within the scope of Obama's duties or authority to anull these laws.
We will fix it though, eventually.
March 28, 2015 at 4:47 PM
Jason ON said…
With any other SCotUS I would say it only needs to get that far, but this SCotUS seems more interested in Biblical and corporate rights than the Bill of Rights. Especially since Scalia is a Constitutionalist. Where in any of our Founding Father's writings did they claim corporations are people or that religious belief should override social civility?
March 28, 2015 at 5:03 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

So, I asked Andrew Tamm, who filled my Stream with a hundred (sarcasm there) animated gifs and cat pictures to...

By
So, I asked Andrew Tamm, who filled my Stream with a hundred (sarcasm there) animated gifs and cat pictures to remove me from whatever Circle he has me in where he posts the animated gifs and cat pictures. It was either that or unfollow him and I didn't see any reason to unfollow him. Me asking https://plus.google.com/112885755521259735422/posts/78dwnvvgh4p <==edited to add the correct link Then he plusses me onto Public posts of animated cat gifs : https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/EuuR1tnU3vJ https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/8r6Grcm2Jpj https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/74PgSu6iL2s Then one of his friends (or Circlers) starts plussing me into posts of animated cat gifs : https://plus.google.com/u/0/107120198886093172821/posts/gRW9JhWLs5T Don't get me wrong, I'm all about sarcasm and messing with people, but this seems sort of childish to me. Am I the only one who thinks so? So far I have only blocked
Read more

I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend.

By
I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend. Why? This stupid #gifwars thing people are so proud of. This Adam Black guy said he doesn't like gifs and now everyone is mass trolling him. Having been mass trolled like this I can relate to him easily enough. Have an opinion and the collective might of Google+'s lower class denizens jump on a bandwagon. I just saw a post where someone wanted to jump on board and had to get clarification she was tagging the proper Adam Black. She wasn't even connected to him ! Nor was she a part of the original discussion. She just wanted to follow the herd. When I called her out of it she claimed, "one gif doesn't make a troll." Perhaps not, but she's contributing to a larger troll effort. One straw doesn't break the camel's back, but thousands will. So, tonight, Google+ disgusts me. It probably will tomorrow as well. And possibly Sunday. I gave up Google+ for two months this spring
Read more