Kimberly Iudakova didn't like my comment on her post (disagreeing with her) so she disabled comments.

By

Kimberly Iudakova didn't like my comment on her post (disagreeing with her) so she disabled comments.

She believes Thomas Jefferson believed the state should have no influence on the church but the church should have influence over the state.

I disagree with that sentiment: religions should have no say in matters of government.

Since we can't discuss this subject on her post, perhaps we can discuss it here. What do you think?

Originally shared by ****

A quote from our founding father that America must always remain "ONE NATION UNDER GOD" to qualify for God's provision and God's protection.

Comments

Brenda Curtis said…
Why do they insist of equating God with Christianity?
September 25, 2013 at 10:15 PM
Jonathon Barton said…
I think that resharing her post (instead of linking to it, and removing the autolink preview at the bottom) serves to spread the idiocy... You know me - We may not see eye to eye on everything, or be best buds, but I'm not an idiot, and I was still sucked in by that image for a second, thinking it was YOU who was arguing to support the point...
September 25, 2013 at 10:28 PM
Colin Fosgate said…
She disabled comments because no argument in the world could possibly defend such nonsense.
September 25, 2013 at 10:35 PM
Kevin C. (KevinC) said…
Brenda Curtis because their book told them there are no other Gods. Zeus is really unhappy that after all that help he gave Ben Franklin with electricity, the nation keeps excluding Him. ;-)
September 25, 2013 at 10:37 PM
Noze P. said…
I belive that its not her since months posting on that profile.
September 25, 2013 at 11:44 PM
William Wylde said…
I think that what one believes will influence how one votes.  Beyond that, no.   I'm sure Jefferson wouldn't have, either, a man who thinks that you should leave people alone unless someone breaks a bone, or robs him doesn't sound like a theocrat.
September 26, 2013 at 12:08 AM
Tom McGill said…
Just more proof that all you need to be popular on G+ is blonde hair, blue eyes, and a pair of tits.

Not one of her posts makes a damn bit of sense, even to the looney right types I know personally.
September 26, 2013 at 1:02 AM
Tom McGill said…
... rofl, I use to have her in my circles a long, long time ago.  She use to post mostly nudes.... now this?  Maybe she got hacked... or more likely she's just plain old crazy.  Sometimes schizophrenia hits unexpectedly.
September 26, 2013 at 1:05 AM
Noze P. said…
Tom McGill she not only posted nudes. Kimberly is profoundly unreligous and the opposite of what you see on her profile now. Or its hacked (which i think is since noone answers ever) or she got brainwash ed.
September 26, 2013 at 4:13 AM
Tom Asby said…
My only question is where she gets her information? That second half wasn't a quote, it was opinion. Where is her citation?
September 26, 2013 at 7:56 AM
S. LeBeau Kpadenou said…
Now, by Thomas Jefferson, she means the guy who raped his wife's underage half-sister (Sally Hemings, his wife's half-sister, was a sixteen year old slave at the beginning of their 'relationship', unable to consent to sex on two counts) and held his own children as slaves? Yeah... I'm gonna say even if he did preach this garbage, we have moved beyond his worldview.
September 26, 2013 at 8:13 AM
Jason ON said…
Yeah Tom McGill , she's obviously from some circle share a while ago and was dumped in my 'religious discussion' circle. Turns out she doesn't like discussion.
September 26, 2013 at 8:37 AM
Eric Swerdlin said…
Jefferson was a diest, not a Christion, http://www.monticello.org/site/research-and-collections/jeffersons-religious-beliefs 
Kimberly is not only narrow minded, but also wrong on her facts.
September 26, 2013 at 9:20 AM
Noze P. said…
Report the profile Jason ON im pretty sure its hacked.
September 26, 2013 at 12:50 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

So, I asked Andrew Tamm, who filled my Stream with a hundred (sarcasm there) animated gifs and cat pictures to...

By
So, I asked Andrew Tamm, who filled my Stream with a hundred (sarcasm there) animated gifs and cat pictures to remove me from whatever Circle he has me in where he posts the animated gifs and cat pictures. It was either that or unfollow him and I didn't see any reason to unfollow him. Me asking https://plus.google.com/112885755521259735422/posts/78dwnvvgh4p <==edited to add the correct link Then he plusses me onto Public posts of animated cat gifs : https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/EuuR1tnU3vJ https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/8r6Grcm2Jpj https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/74PgSu6iL2s Then one of his friends (or Circlers) starts plussing me into posts of animated cat gifs : https://plus.google.com/u/0/107120198886093172821/posts/gRW9JhWLs5T Don't get me wrong, I'm all about sarcasm and messing with people, but this seems sort of childish to me. Am I the only one who thinks so? So far I have only blocked
Read more

I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend.

By
I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend. Why? This stupid #gifwars thing people are so proud of. This Adam Black guy said he doesn't like gifs and now everyone is mass trolling him. Having been mass trolled like this I can relate to him easily enough. Have an opinion and the collective might of Google+'s lower class denizens jump on a bandwagon. I just saw a post where someone wanted to jump on board and had to get clarification she was tagging the proper Adam Black. She wasn't even connected to him ! Nor was she a part of the original discussion. She just wanted to follow the herd. When I called her out of it she claimed, "one gif doesn't make a troll." Perhaps not, but she's contributing to a larger troll effort. One straw doesn't break the camel's back, but thousands will. So, tonight, Google+ disgusts me. It probably will tomorrow as well. And possibly Sunday. I gave up Google+ for two months this spring
Read more