They bring up a great point.
They bring up a great point. The entrapment aside, how can anyone trust the legal system, which is supposed to be unbiased, when the system begins and ends with corruption in the name of exacerbating a war no one wants?
Originally shared by RT
We've all heard of pre-emptive strikes but what about pre-emptive prosecutions? Muslims in the US are outraged by what appears to be America's latest tactic in its war on terror - entrapping people it suspects might plan terrorist acts in the future. Marina Portnaya explains how almost 95% of convictions for this crime are the result of FBI provocation.
http://youtu.be/KpUkRchJxv0
Originally shared by RT
We've all heard of pre-emptive strikes but what about pre-emptive prosecutions? Muslims in the US are outraged by what appears to be America's latest tactic in its war on terror - entrapping people it suspects might plan terrorist acts in the future. Marina Portnaya explains how almost 95% of convictions for this crime are the result of FBI provocation.
http://youtu.be/KpUkRchJxv0
Comments
This is a long con. The FBI or other police force uses soft subtle nudges over the course of months or years, perhaps even encouraging someone who might not to do something they can then be arrested for. It might be something as simple as "Hey, can you run to Home Depot and get me some fertilizer?" Suddenly, they're "buying bombs supplies." Or they might be encouraged to show up at a protest and suddenly they're a anti-USA political activist.
Let's put it this way. If a random stranger comes up to you on the street and asks you to hold their phone for them while they search for something in their pockets, and being a nice guy you agree, so you take the phone while the stranger is searching through their pockets, are you a terrorist?
What if the guy was a FBI agent and had the names and numbers of suspected terrorists in his phone which you now control?
What if the stranger suddenly cuffed you and arrested you for terrorism, insurrection or as a traitor?
This is what the article is talking about.
When the police (or rather, the FBI) entrap someone it's not a "here hold this bomb, I'll be right back with handcuffs" scenario, it's more subtle, targeted at those who are the most influential and who are coerced into playing one role in a much larger scheme.
They then arrest these people who have no idea they've been set up or participated in a "terrorist" plot.
But hey, you want to live in a world of like minded people with the right background, the right parentage and the right education. That's fine. Go back to your fenced in covenant community. However, the rest of the world lives in reality where people have lower IQs, have backgrounds that convey easily an influenced mind.