Seems Fox News will have anyone on camera as long as they say outrageously weird stuff.

By
Seems Fox News will have anyone on camera as long as they say outrageously weird stuff. Too bad if some of the claims are actually true (like Obama eating fudge in bed) they're drowned out by wild allegations such as Hillary being raped by Bill and sticking by his side for 30 years thereafter.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/06/24/fox-news-guest-bill-clinton-plotted-using-own-death-to-make-hillary-president/#.U6m_X0bLsDs.google_plusone_share

Comments

Steve Johnson said…
I don't think they're wild allegations, I actually think most, if not all, are true, just sensationalized.  I think politics is full of enemies and back stabbers, and has always been.  We never saw this stuff on TV before because there had been just a handful of news networks, and the networks had enough advertisers to be selective with their journalism.  Now that Cable TV has created hundreds of channels, there are fewer advertisers to go around, so news networks have to broadcast trivial and sensationalized news just to build an audience. That's why guys like Ed Klein now get visibility.  I think Fox News is less apologetic about its sensationalism.  Watch CNN, NBC, et al, and you'll see they spend as much time reporting junk news, they just do it with more stature.
June 24, 2014 at 1:42 PM
SEAN PAN said…
Biden/Warren 2016.
June 24, 2014 at 2:07 PM
Richard McMakin said…
Post this type of crap on the internet and some are stupid enough to think it's true. Pry on the ignorant, to encourage them to vote for your ideology.
June 24, 2014 at 5:29 PM
Jason ON said…
This post is hot on Google?
June 25, 2014 at 11:22 AM
SEAN PAN said…
Admit it. What you really want is to draft Dick Cheney to run on 2016 ticket.
June 25, 2014 at 12:33 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

So, I asked Andrew Tamm, who filled my Stream with a hundred (sarcasm there) animated gifs and cat pictures to...

By
So, I asked Andrew Tamm, who filled my Stream with a hundred (sarcasm there) animated gifs and cat pictures to remove me from whatever Circle he has me in where he posts the animated gifs and cat pictures. It was either that or unfollow him and I didn't see any reason to unfollow him. Me asking https://plus.google.com/112885755521259735422/posts/78dwnvvgh4p <==edited to add the correct link Then he plusses me onto Public posts of animated cat gifs : https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/EuuR1tnU3vJ https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/8r6Grcm2Jpj https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/74PgSu6iL2s Then one of his friends (or Circlers) starts plussing me into posts of animated cat gifs : https://plus.google.com/u/0/107120198886093172821/posts/gRW9JhWLs5T Don't get me wrong, I'm all about sarcasm and messing with people, but this seems sort of childish to me. Am I the only one who thinks so? So far I have only blocked
Read more

I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend.

By
I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend. Why? This stupid #gifwars thing people are so proud of. This Adam Black guy said he doesn't like gifs and now everyone is mass trolling him. Having been mass trolled like this I can relate to him easily enough. Have an opinion and the collective might of Google+'s lower class denizens jump on a bandwagon. I just saw a post where someone wanted to jump on board and had to get clarification she was tagging the proper Adam Black. She wasn't even connected to him ! Nor was she a part of the original discussion. She just wanted to follow the herd. When I called her out of it she claimed, "one gif doesn't make a troll." Perhaps not, but she's contributing to a larger troll effort. One straw doesn't break the camel's back, but thousands will. So, tonight, Google+ disgusts me. It probably will tomorrow as well. And possibly Sunday. I gave up Google+ for two months this spring
Read more