This is a tough one: two conflicting orders.

This is a tough one: two conflicting orders. What if the prescription hadn't been a dog but a drug? Would this soldier be allowed to bring his drug on site? And there is no reason for the order unless the CO just doesn't like dogs.

Granted, I'm confused about how he's allowed to stay in the military while needing a service dig in the first place...

Via miri dunn
http://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/mobile/soldier-faces-court-martial-for-bringing-service-dog-to-work-1.1602912

Comments

Nandlal Shah said…
IMO it is violation of ADA.
miri dunn said…
he is a valuable member of the military. He is a recruiter, for one. He helped my son over the last year and is a great man. And everyone lvoes the dog- which is also a trained police and drug sniffing dog (I am told) There is no reason for this action except a personal power play, in my mind
miri dunn said…
Yes, a Canadian soldier based out of  New Brunswick. He is my son's commanding officer
miri dunn said…
Not that I know of. Our current govt promised a Candian with Disabilities ACt 8 years ago and have not come through
Sharon Creamer said…
Was he performing as a soldier?  Was the dog ordered to work, also.  Is he being tried, where he should be, in a military Court?
miri dunn said…
he is , yes, a soldier - a military police , A doctor ordered him to take the dog with him everywhere including work - / it is being investigated and if charges are borught it will be in a military court

Popular posts from this blog

So, I asked Andrew Tamm, who filled my Stream with a hundred (sarcasm there) animated gifs and cat pictures to...