About the only thing that doesn't make this quite true is there isn't any sort of registration going on - yet.

By

About the only thing that doesn't make this quite true is there isn't any sort of registration going on - yet.

#TrumpNation

Originally shared by Sandra lFrank

Comments

James Dubreze said…
There was never a true separation of Church and State. The very fact that the president of the United States must swear on the Bible in order to become president signified that Church and States exist as a union not separate.
January 28, 2017 at 3:21 PM
CathiBea Stevenson said…
James Dubreze there is no rule saying that the elected president has to use a Bible. It is merely tradition
January 28, 2017 at 3:27 PM
Terence Reale said…
While it is true there is no official registration, this regime is savvy. They will use social media, and all the info the government already has on us, to put us all into nice neat little lables. You should be OK jason, you are of the "right" decent, but your liberal leanings... well that'll get you in trouble.
January 28, 2017 at 3:51 PM
Bodhipaksa said…
CathiBea Stevenson is correct. There is no requirement that a Bible be used, and the words "so help me god" are not in the official oath, but have been snuck in (unconstitutionally, in my view).
January 28, 2017 at 4:17 PM
Dean Hayes said…
While the ban is wrong our constitution doesn't apply to non US citizens. Eric Garland is wrong or just hyping things up.
January 28, 2017 at 6:01 PM
Jason ON said…
Dean Hayes​ yes it does. Aside from running for office or voting, that is. The Bill of Rights apply to everyone within the domain of the USA.

If you believe otherwise, pleae open up your copy and show where it states otherwise.

Also: https://plus.google.com/+CaraEvangelista/posts/eFhN9nwH9kG
January 29, 2017 at 1:27 PM
Dean Hayes said…
He doesn't differentiate between those in the borders. Outside of country the Bill of Rights can't be used. A Syrian Christian can't use it in Syria. All people including Christan's, Jews, athiest and Muslims from those countries have been blocked entry. Wrong yes but they are not protected by the Constitution
January 29, 2017 at 1:40 PM
Jason ON said…
Dean Hayes, outside our borders the Constitution doesn't apply to anyone. That's where international law and treaty come into play.
January 29, 2017 at 3:13 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

So, I asked Andrew Tamm, who filled my Stream with a hundred (sarcasm there) animated gifs and cat pictures to...

By
So, I asked Andrew Tamm, who filled my Stream with a hundred (sarcasm there) animated gifs and cat pictures to remove me from whatever Circle he has me in where he posts the animated gifs and cat pictures. It was either that or unfollow him and I didn't see any reason to unfollow him. Me asking https://plus.google.com/112885755521259735422/posts/78dwnvvgh4p <==edited to add the correct link Then he plusses me onto Public posts of animated cat gifs : https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/EuuR1tnU3vJ https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/8r6Grcm2Jpj https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/74PgSu6iL2s Then one of his friends (or Circlers) starts plussing me into posts of animated cat gifs : https://plus.google.com/u/0/107120198886093172821/posts/gRW9JhWLs5T Don't get me wrong, I'm all about sarcasm and messing with people, but this seems sort of childish to me. Am I the only one who thinks so? So far I have only blocked
Read more

I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend.

By
I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend. Why? This stupid #gifwars thing people are so proud of. This Adam Black guy said he doesn't like gifs and now everyone is mass trolling him. Having been mass trolled like this I can relate to him easily enough. Have an opinion and the collective might of Google+'s lower class denizens jump on a bandwagon. I just saw a post where someone wanted to jump on board and had to get clarification she was tagging the proper Adam Black. She wasn't even connected to him ! Nor was she a part of the original discussion. She just wanted to follow the herd. When I called her out of it she claimed, "one gif doesn't make a troll." Perhaps not, but she's contributing to a larger troll effort. One straw doesn't break the camel's back, but thousands will. So, tonight, Google+ disgusts me. It probably will tomorrow as well. And possibly Sunday. I gave up Google+ for two months this spring
Read more