New evidence has come to light that the FBI and the DNC may have worked in tandem to defeat #DonaldTrump giving...

By
New evidence has come to light that the FBI and the DNC may have worked in tandem to defeat #DonaldTrump giving #TrumpNation more to cry about with the so-called #deepstate.

Of course, we won't know for sure until the documents are all released and we can have a public review.

The growing body of evidence that the FBI used mostly politically-motivated, unverified intelligence from an opponent to justify spying on the GOP nominee's campaign - just weeks before Election Day - has prompted a growing number of Republicans to ask President Trump to declassify the rest of the FBI's main documents in the Russia collusion case.
https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/409817-russia-collusion-bombshell-dnc-lawyers-met-with-fbi-on-dossier-before

Comments

Terence Reale said…
Perhaps this is Russian gas lighting. They are good at chess, and they're running the board.
October 4, 2018 at 11:30 AM
Bodhipaksa said…
Sounds like this comes straight from the Trump team.
October 4, 2018 at 11:40 AM
Roberto Bayardo said…
This reporting struck me as horribly one sided. That quote in particular that the FBI used "mostly" politically motivated sources is wholly unsubstantiated. The only meat here is the FBI may have met with lawyers from the DNC. And given the repeated hack attempts against Democrats by Russian intelligence, wouldn't that be expected? As for evidence of bias, one would expect a balanced report to point out that the dossier was in fact sourced by the Republican opposition to Trump.
October 4, 2018 at 11:47 AM
Jason ON said…
The Hill is on the conservative side, but they're generally pretty accurate in their reporting.
October 4, 2018 at 6:42 PM
Roberto Bayardo said…
Yeah I realize The Hill is reasonably respectable, but even the best outlets sometimes publish real stinkers.
October 4, 2018 at 11:13 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

So, I asked Andrew Tamm, who filled my Stream with a hundred (sarcasm there) animated gifs and cat pictures to...

By
So, I asked Andrew Tamm, who filled my Stream with a hundred (sarcasm there) animated gifs and cat pictures to remove me from whatever Circle he has me in where he posts the animated gifs and cat pictures. It was either that or unfollow him and I didn't see any reason to unfollow him. Me asking https://plus.google.com/112885755521259735422/posts/78dwnvvgh4p <==edited to add the correct link Then he plusses me onto Public posts of animated cat gifs : https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/EuuR1tnU3vJ https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/8r6Grcm2Jpj https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/74PgSu6iL2s Then one of his friends (or Circlers) starts plussing me into posts of animated cat gifs : https://plus.google.com/u/0/107120198886093172821/posts/gRW9JhWLs5T Don't get me wrong, I'm all about sarcasm and messing with people, but this seems sort of childish to me. Am I the only one who thinks so? So far I have only blocked
Read more

I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend.

By
I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend. Why? This stupid #gifwars thing people are so proud of. This Adam Black guy said he doesn't like gifs and now everyone is mass trolling him. Having been mass trolled like this I can relate to him easily enough. Have an opinion and the collective might of Google+'s lower class denizens jump on a bandwagon. I just saw a post where someone wanted to jump on board and had to get clarification she was tagging the proper Adam Black. She wasn't even connected to him ! Nor was she a part of the original discussion. She just wanted to follow the herd. When I called her out of it she claimed, "one gif doesn't make a troll." Perhaps not, but she's contributing to a larger troll effort. One straw doesn't break the camel's back, but thousands will. So, tonight, Google+ disgusts me. It probably will tomorrow as well. And possibly Sunday. I gave up Google+ for two months this spring
Read more