This is the problem with strict Constitutionalist judges: they look at the Constitution and say, oh, none of the...

This is the problem with strict Constitutionalist judges: they look at the Constitution and say, oh, none of the Bill of Rights expressly forbid dog attacks even though the canine is legally considered an officer of the law and under the direction of a human handler where everyone else can clearly see what just occurred.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/03/10/appeals_court_rules_homeless_man_cannot_sue_cop_who_let_police_dog_maul.html