What if foreign nations could circumvent the warrant process and demand US technology companies hand over...

What if foreign nations could circumvent the warrant process and demand US technology companies hand over information to them? All with no checks and balances, just a promise to be altruistic?

_The bill states that the Justice Department must consider whether a country respects free expression, without stating whether free expression is defined under U.S. law, international law, or a country’s own domestic law;

The bill states the Justice Department must consider whether a country respects “international universal human rights” without definition or clarity regarding how to assess this (indeed, this is not a recognized term in U.S. or international law);

The bill requires that requests be based on “articulable and credible facts, particularity, legality, and severity regarding the conduct under investigations”—a standard that is, at best, vague and subject to different interpretations, and is likely lower than the current probable cause standard applied to requests;

The bill fails to prohibit agreements in cases in which a country has a pattern or practice of engaging in human rights abuses, nor does it require an assessment as to whether there is effective central control of law enforcement or intelligence units;

The bill fails to require that countries meet any standards for metadata requests—leaving companies free to provide this data to human rights abusing countries without restriction;

For the first time, the bill allows foreign governments to wiretap and intercept communications in real-time, without even requiring governments to adhere to critical privacy protections in the Wiretap Act (such as notice, probable cause, or a set duration); and

The bill permits broad information sharing between governments, allowing countries (including the U.S.) to obtain information from foreign partners under standards that may be lower than their own domestic law_.

#CLOUDAct

Originally shared by Electronic Frontier Foundation

The CLOUD Act hurts the free speech and human rights of people all over the world by creating a clique of nations who can get data from U.S. companies without a warrant.
https://lawfareblog.com/cloud-act-doesnt-help-privacy-and-human-rights-it-hurts-them

Comments

The first country to make the list will inexplicably be Russia.
Jason ON said…
James Hollenbeck probably.
Stephen Dickson said…
America has been doing this for years. Five eyes etc.

The human rights thing, what's the saying about casting the first stone...
Jason ON said…
Stephen Dickson how many other countries have checks and balances, Constitutional protections and a Bill of Rights?
Stephen Dickson said…
All of the countries in five eyes for a start.
Jason ON said…
Well, considering your nation of New Zealand has a non-codified Constitution and Great Britain doesn't have one at all, then your previous statement is incorrect, Stephen Dickson.
Stephen Dickson said…
Tomatos tamatos.

We think your election system is rubbish and in fact wrong.
But you live with it.



Jason ON said…
Ours is codified in a Constitution. You say tomato / tomato and I say: formal and informal.

Popular posts from this blog

So, I asked Andrew Tamm, who filled my Stream with a hundred (sarcasm there) animated gifs and cat pictures to...

I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend.