Two senior officials want to keep the the public in the know, however their points 9f view contradict the GOP'S take...
Two senior officials want to keep the the public in the know, however their points 9f view contradict the GOP'S take on the whole situation.
I wonder why the GOP doesn't want their interviews made public.
Can we say "politicizing" anyone?
http://www.govexec.com/defense/2013/05/pickering-says-he-will-testify-benghazi-only-public/63223/
I wonder why the GOP doesn't want their interviews made public.
Can we say "politicizing" anyone?
http://www.govexec.com/defense/2013/05/pickering-says-he-will-testify-benghazi-only-public/63223/
Comments
They flat out, knowingly lied.
Evidence? Everything I've seen shows no such "proof". Was the administration wrong in the cause of the embassay attack immediately following the attack? Possibly, but that's how investigations work: you have an effect and you look for a cause. The cause is always fluid as more and more evidence comes in.
Now, you must know more about al Qaeda and the Syrian civil war than anyone in Congress be because I've read no substantial claims of al Qaeda's involvement in the embassy attack.
The whole "scandal" is GOP blustering. They're not interested in the truth, they're interested in fabricat8ng some sort of scandal to make the president they've been obstructing and a possible Democratic presidential candidate for 2016 look bad.
That's all.
Seriously, man. I can't believe you bought into all this shit.
But, then you're probably thinking the same thing about me right now, so I guess its a wash.
There's in one thing I do think we can agree on: we aren't being told the truth, and we'd both like it known.