Modern technology has made recording history so incredibly easy and yet, at the same time, it's made every single...

Modern technology has made recording history so incredibly easy and yet, at the same time, it's made every single version of an account questionable.

Transcripts published by the http://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/16/world/europe/russia-trump-putin-news-conference-transcript.html and http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2018/07/16/full-text-president-trumps-news-conference-with-russias-putin/?utm_term=.bbb6f54d9cad mirror the White House transcript, while https://www.npr.org/2018/07/16/629462401/transcript-president-trump-and-russian-president-putins-joint-press-conference’s contains the full exchange. Confusing matters further, http://www.c-span.org/video/?448421-1/presidents-trump-putin-reject-2016-election-campaign-collusion&live=’s footage contains Mason’s full question but only the second half of Putin’s answer.
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/07/trump-putin-press-conference-transcript/565385/

Comments

Bob Lai said…
Also, don’t ask compound questions.
Bryce Miller said…
Bob Lai what do you mean and why? ;P
Bob Lai said…
If you are trying to detect falsehood, don’t ask two-part questions. What did Putin’s, “Yes, I did,” apply to? Did he not hear the question(s)? Which one was he giving an answer to?
Jason ON said…
Bob Lai reporters often use compound questions because those being questioned rarely allow follow-ups. So, they do this to get multiple questions in and to force a more in depth response than "Yes" or "no."
Bob Lai said…
This can be ameliorated by requiring two different answers. Don't combine two yes/no questions - use the classic 'did you know this' and 'when did you learn of it'?

Popular posts from this blog

I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend.