Modern technology has made recording history so incredibly easy and yet, at the same time, it's made every single...

By
Modern technology has made recording history so incredibly easy and yet, at the same time, it's made every single version of an account questionable.

Transcripts published by the http://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/16/world/europe/russia-trump-putin-news-conference-transcript.html and http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2018/07/16/full-text-president-trumps-news-conference-with-russias-putin/?utm_term=.bbb6f54d9cad mirror the White House transcript, while https://www.npr.org/2018/07/16/629462401/transcript-president-trump-and-russian-president-putins-joint-press-conference’s contains the full exchange. Confusing matters further, http://www.c-span.org/video/?448421-1/presidents-trump-putin-reject-2016-election-campaign-collusion&live=’s footage contains Mason’s full question but only the second half of Putin’s answer.
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/07/trump-putin-press-conference-transcript/565385/

Comments

Bob Lai said…
Also, don’t ask compound questions.
July 17, 2018 at 11:50 PM
Bryce Miller said…
Bob Lai what do you mean and why? ;P
July 18, 2018 at 10:06 AM
Bob Lai said…
If you are trying to detect falsehood, don’t ask two-part questions. What did Putin’s, “Yes, I did,” apply to? Did he not hear the question(s)? Which one was he giving an answer to?
July 18, 2018 at 11:13 AM
Jason ON said…
Bob Lai reporters often use compound questions because those being questioned rarely allow follow-ups. So, they do this to get multiple questions in and to force a more in depth response than "Yes" or "no."
July 18, 2018 at 12:00 PM
Bob Lai said…
This can be ameliorated by requiring two different answers. Don't combine two yes/no questions - use the classic 'did you know this' and 'when did you learn of it'?
July 18, 2018 at 12:04 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

So, I asked Andrew Tamm, who filled my Stream with a hundred (sarcasm there) animated gifs and cat pictures to...

By
So, I asked Andrew Tamm, who filled my Stream with a hundred (sarcasm there) animated gifs and cat pictures to remove me from whatever Circle he has me in where he posts the animated gifs and cat pictures. It was either that or unfollow him and I didn't see any reason to unfollow him. Me asking https://plus.google.com/112885755521259735422/posts/78dwnvvgh4p <==edited to add the correct link Then he plusses me onto Public posts of animated cat gifs : https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/EuuR1tnU3vJ https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/8r6Grcm2Jpj https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/74PgSu6iL2s Then one of his friends (or Circlers) starts plussing me into posts of animated cat gifs : https://plus.google.com/u/0/107120198886093172821/posts/gRW9JhWLs5T Don't get me wrong, I'm all about sarcasm and messing with people, but this seems sort of childish to me. Am I the only one who thinks so? So far I have only blocked
Read more

I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend.

By
I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend. Why? This stupid #gifwars thing people are so proud of. This Adam Black guy said he doesn't like gifs and now everyone is mass trolling him. Having been mass trolled like this I can relate to him easily enough. Have an opinion and the collective might of Google+'s lower class denizens jump on a bandwagon. I just saw a post where someone wanted to jump on board and had to get clarification she was tagging the proper Adam Black. She wasn't even connected to him ! Nor was she a part of the original discussion. She just wanted to follow the herd. When I called her out of it she claimed, "one gif doesn't make a troll." Perhaps not, but she's contributing to a larger troll effort. One straw doesn't break the camel's back, but thousands will. So, tonight, Google+ disgusts me. It probably will tomorrow as well. And possibly Sunday. I gave up Google+ for two months this spring
Read more