Trump likes to hammer Hillary on her so-called email scandal, but Trump has a history of being so much worse than...

By
Trump likes to hammer Hillary on her so-called email scandal, but Trump has a history of being so much worse than anything Clinton's been accused of.
http://www.newsweek.com/2016/11/11/donald-trump-companies-destroyed-emails-documents-515120.html

Comments

Lorne Thomas said…
You obviously are illiterate Jason ON because all the emails and the contents of them you must not have read, and you buy this piece of obvious propaganda from the HRC camp. But the thing that makes you a tool, is that you share it.
October 31, 2016 at 7:22 PM
Lorne Thomas said…
And you post more propaganda from the HRC team, but never post any thing other than opinions and fiction at best. You ignore the emails because they are the inconvenient truth that you support a criminal family and a criminal enterprise that is doing all it can to stay above the law, and change the laws to reflect the worst Orwellian ways, but it is correct think and you have been conditioned to pull the party line and pay lip service to the approved talking points. lol, such a tool.
October 31, 2016 at 8:24 PM
Jason ON said…
And you're a moron. You believe everything in this universe that doesn't attack Hillary Clinton's character is pro-Clinton propaganda.
October 31, 2016 at 10:49 PM
Jason ON said…
Alex Shull, sadly I receive far more of these emails than anyone should, but at least they're from the left after working on Obama's first campaign and Bernie's run this year.
November 2, 2016 at 1:45 PM
Lorne Thomas said…
To far to the left, like the OP, and you are challenging a box of hammers for and I.Q. The argument is that more extreme views, whether right-wing or left-wing, tend to be associated with dogmatism and rigidity, which are more appealing to less intelligent people.
November 2, 2016 at 4:17 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

So, I asked Andrew Tamm, who filled my Stream with a hundred (sarcasm there) animated gifs and cat pictures to...

By
So, I asked Andrew Tamm, who filled my Stream with a hundred (sarcasm there) animated gifs and cat pictures to remove me from whatever Circle he has me in where he posts the animated gifs and cat pictures. It was either that or unfollow him and I didn't see any reason to unfollow him. Me asking https://plus.google.com/112885755521259735422/posts/78dwnvvgh4p <==edited to add the correct link Then he plusses me onto Public posts of animated cat gifs : https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/EuuR1tnU3vJ https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/8r6Grcm2Jpj https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/74PgSu6iL2s Then one of his friends (or Circlers) starts plussing me into posts of animated cat gifs : https://plus.google.com/u/0/107120198886093172821/posts/gRW9JhWLs5T Don't get me wrong, I'm all about sarcasm and messing with people, but this seems sort of childish to me. Am I the only one who thinks so? So far I have only blocked
Read more

I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend.

By
I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend. Why? This stupid #gifwars thing people are so proud of. This Adam Black guy said he doesn't like gifs and now everyone is mass trolling him. Having been mass trolled like this I can relate to him easily enough. Have an opinion and the collective might of Google+'s lower class denizens jump on a bandwagon. I just saw a post where someone wanted to jump on board and had to get clarification she was tagging the proper Adam Black. She wasn't even connected to him ! Nor was she a part of the original discussion. She just wanted to follow the herd. When I called her out of it she claimed, "one gif doesn't make a troll." Perhaps not, but she's contributing to a larger troll effort. One straw doesn't break the camel's back, but thousands will. So, tonight, Google+ disgusts me. It probably will tomorrow as well. And possibly Sunday. I gave up Google+ for two months this spring
Read more