Let's see, (1) In St.

By
Let's see, (1) In St. Louis, a reportedly unarmed black man shot for ... Well, we really don't know. Right now it seems he was shot for nothing more than being black

(2) Another guy runs from the St. Louis police and broke an officer's hand. He was apprehended without a single bullet being shot.

Can we spot the differences?
http://www.kmov.com/news/crime/Police-Suspect-hides-in-womans-basement-assaults-officers-271009211.html

Comments

Richard S said…
Which one happened first?  If #1 happened first #2 may have gotten away with it simply because of the publicity of #1.
August 18, 2014 at 10:00 PM
Martha Velazquez said…
Yes, a very glaring difference
August 18, 2014 at 10:00 PM
NINOX INTELLIGENCE said…
Yes, they don't shoot blokes with moustaches ...
August 18, 2014 at 10:30 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend.

By
I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend. Why? This stupid #gifwars thing people are so proud of. This Adam Black guy said he doesn't like gifs and now everyone is mass trolling him. Having been mass trolled like this I can relate to him easily enough. Have an opinion and the collective might of Google+'s lower class denizens jump on a bandwagon. I just saw a post where someone wanted to jump on board and had to get clarification she was tagging the proper Adam Black. She wasn't even connected to him ! Nor was she a part of the original discussion. She just wanted to follow the herd. When I called her out of it she claimed, "one gif doesn't make a troll." Perhaps not, but she's contributing to a larger troll effort. One straw doesn't break the camel's back, but thousands will. So, tonight, Google+ disgusts me. It probably will tomorrow as well. And possibly Sunday. I gave up Google+ for two months this spring
Read more