I'll grant, not everything in the EU was good and some was downright awful, but to slash 30 years of books, comics,...

I'll grant, not everything in the EU was good and some was downright awful, but to slash 30 years of books, comics, video games and other canonical histories of that far far galaxy away seems a bit harsh.

Of course, Disney does have a history of ignoring the source material if a story they're copying in or to make it "more Disney."
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2014/01/op-ed-disney-takes-a-chainsaw-to-the-star-wars-expanded-universe/

Comments

Dave Maez said…
I don't see how they had a choice.  And if the Thrawn series represented some of the EU's best, then it's an even easier choice.

Lucasfilm did this to themselves by allowing so much awful writing to be done for the sake of a buck.  Besides the crappy EU, we also ended up with the Phantom Menace and Indiana Jones 4 (shiver).

I will say that there were a lot of decent comic books from Dark Horse, and the KOTOR games were bright spots too.
Jason ON said…
The Heir to the Empire trilogy was fantastic and even better than their source material, is: the original trilogy.

However, different writer and different editors are going to take characters and stories in different directions. It happened in the EU as it happens in Marvel and DC, Mechwarrior and dozens of other world series (Forgotten Realms, anyone?). This would be like Sony negating 40 years of Spider-Man because they want Peter Parker to remain in highschool. I mean, we'd all like to forget the clone saga, but it is a part of the character just as the EU is a part of a distant galaxy's history.

Had they been smart they would have limited the EU to a thousand year before/after ANH-RotJ.
Jason ON said…
I read A Splinter in the Mind's Eye which also took place between movies one and two and showed some 'making out' between Luke and Leia.

Popular posts from this blog

I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend.