This is science.

By
This is science. While trying to test a hypothesis engineers accidentally developed a new more efficient way of smelting, a process in use for about seven millennia, give or take a few years.

Yay, science!
https://www.engadget.com/2016/08/24/mit-accidentally-discovered-a-cleaner-smelting-process/?sr_source=Twitter

Comments

John Bump said…
I'd like to know more what they mean by traditional smelting. Electrolytic refining like this has (to my knowledge) completely supplanted traditional coke-based smelting since about 1880, and I suspect what they're talking about here when they say 'traditional' is old coke-based smelting.
As an aside, I've actually done this. I overstudied for a physical chemistry test one time, so the night before, rather than reading the same stuff over yet again, I made an electrolytic refining setup with NaCl and NaCO3 (to lower the melting point) in a small crucible over an oxymethane burner, with a power supply hooked to the crucible, and managed to make small but visible quantities of sodium metal.
August 25, 2016 at 11:51 AM
Curtis Edenfield said…
Every copper smelter I've been uses electrical power from dams. They use something similar to giant arc welding rods to melt the ore. The refining process requires natural gas. All the exhaust is used for sulfuric acid and compressed oxygen production. The left over toxic sludge is sent to petro chemical companies for use there.
August 25, 2016 at 1:04 PM
Jason ON said…
You guys know what I know and that's in the article. I have to trust the kids at MIT are smarter than me (at this).
August 25, 2016 at 4:40 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

So, I asked Andrew Tamm, who filled my Stream with a hundred (sarcasm there) animated gifs and cat pictures to...

By
So, I asked Andrew Tamm, who filled my Stream with a hundred (sarcasm there) animated gifs and cat pictures to remove me from whatever Circle he has me in where he posts the animated gifs and cat pictures. It was either that or unfollow him and I didn't see any reason to unfollow him. Me asking https://plus.google.com/112885755521259735422/posts/78dwnvvgh4p <==edited to add the correct link Then he plusses me onto Public posts of animated cat gifs : https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/EuuR1tnU3vJ https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/8r6Grcm2Jpj https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/74PgSu6iL2s Then one of his friends (or Circlers) starts plussing me into posts of animated cat gifs : https://plus.google.com/u/0/107120198886093172821/posts/gRW9JhWLs5T Don't get me wrong, I'm all about sarcasm and messing with people, but this seems sort of childish to me. Am I the only one who thinks so? So far I have only blocked
Read more

I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend.

By
I'm shutting down Google+ for the night and quite possibly for the weekend. Why? This stupid #gifwars thing people are so proud of. This Adam Black guy said he doesn't like gifs and now everyone is mass trolling him. Having been mass trolled like this I can relate to him easily enough. Have an opinion and the collective might of Google+'s lower class denizens jump on a bandwagon. I just saw a post where someone wanted to jump on board and had to get clarification she was tagging the proper Adam Black. She wasn't even connected to him ! Nor was she a part of the original discussion. She just wanted to follow the herd. When I called her out of it she claimed, "one gif doesn't make a troll." Perhaps not, but she's contributing to a larger troll effort. One straw doesn't break the camel's back, but thousands will. So, tonight, Google+ disgusts me. It probably will tomorrow as well. And possibly Sunday. I gave up Google+ for two months this spring
Read more