Alexander S. Kunz that'll always be a difference between topics and threads. At least G+ has formatting in its comments, and supports long-form replies rather than having to split it over multiple chained comments.
Jason ON I always found that, when conversations got longer it's impossible to "jump in and catch up" on Google+ - who said what in reply to whom precisely is impossible to figure out - at least if you're not IN the conversation right as it happens and is "active".
Maybe it takes time to get used to how things work on Twitter, but I find its conversational features quite useful, actually. You can click on individual replies & see where the conversation went from there in the thread view, right on the site (I don't use any social apps on my phone so I don't know what it looks like there).
I don't have longer & more meaningful conversations on any social media site anyway, and I always wonder why people are SO eager to bury conversations in some social networking site they have no control of.
If it's something meaningful that I have to say and want to preserve, then I post it to my website (or personal blog) anyway.
Filip H.F. Slagter most things I have to say in a casual conversation easily fit into Twitter's 500 characters, or I can "thread" them by paragraph (and maybe add a /1 /2 /3 etc. for those who catch up later). I guess I'm fairly used to it because Twitter is by far my favorite social site.
Filip H.F. Slagter oh you're right! I have no idea how I got 500 in my head... must be because 280 feels like so much, still. ;-) (especially since the @ mentions don't count anymore)
Alexander S. Kunz maybe because Mastodon has a 500 character limit instead? :) Mastodon's 500 character limit better suits my needs, though I still tend to run into it. I'll probably end up running my own Pleroma solo-instance with a much more increased limit, and federate that with Mastodon instead. :)
Alexander S. Kunz I'll agree that some of the longer comment threads on G+ can be cumbersome to follow due to not being able to pick up where we left off, but 280 limit is just non-conducive to a discussion.
So, Minnesota would rather people not be able to advance themselves without the officiating organization paying a fee, first? Do libraries have to pay a fee to lend books? Do documentaries put together by universities have to pay a fee first? If I move into the state and give away old college text books, do I have to pay a fee first? http://www.forbes.com/sites/evapereira/2012/10/19/minnesota-bans-free-online-education/
Are you a terrorist? http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/saudi-arabia-declares-all-atheists-are-terrorists-in-new-law-to-crack-down-on-political-dissidents-9228389.html
Comments
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1060511898347692032.html
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1060925606966296576.html
But yes, G+'s comments system is far from ideal.
On a side note, it took me three - 3! - tweets earlier to reply to a simple request from someone on Twitter.
Ridiculous.
Maybe it takes time to get used to how things work on Twitter, but I find its conversational features quite useful, actually. You can click on individual replies & see where the conversation went from there in the thread view, right on the site (I don't use any social apps on my phone so I don't know what it looks like there).
I don't have longer & more meaningful conversations on any social media site anyway, and I always wonder why people are SO eager to bury conversations in some social networking site they have no control of.
If it's something meaningful that I have to say and want to preserve, then I post it to my website (or personal blog) anyway.
Mastodon's 500 character limit better suits my needs, though I still tend to run into it. I'll probably end up running my own Pleroma solo-instance with a much more increased limit, and federate that with Mastodon instead. :)