""They [evolutionists] are not stupid people, they are bright, but they are bright enough to know there is no scientific evidence they can give in a minitrial," Mastropaolo said." (Scratching my head. So, he felt confident about putting up the $10,000 because he is counting on the intelligence of the evolutionists not to accept...??? I are cornfuzzled. There is a dissonance here.)
wait a sec.....he demands that the scientific community present evidence, while all he has to do is show faith? From the article:
Contest rules state that evidence must be scientific, which means it is "objective, valid, reliable and calibrated".
How is any literal interpretation (THAT word is hardly objective in itself) of the Bible going to be "objective" or especially "valid", proven "reliable" and "calibrated". It seems the good creationist has set up a one-sided minitrial in order to collect $20,000.00 (the other party has to put up $10,000.00 also!)
Of the two of them, we now know which one Vlad "the Mad" Putin believes is the girl in their relationship. For a "macho macho man" like #DonaldTrump that's going to hurt. #TrumpNation http://www.denverpost.com/2017/09/05/vladmir-putin-donald-trump/
So, I asked Andrew Tamm, who filled my Stream with a hundred (sarcasm there) animated gifs and cat pictures to remove me from whatever Circle he has me in where he posts the animated gifs and cat pictures. It was either that or unfollow him and I didn't see any reason to unfollow him. Me asking https://plus.google.com/112885755521259735422/posts/78dwnvvgh4p Then he plusses me onto Public posts of animated cat gifs : https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/EuuR1tnU3vJ https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/8r6Grcm2Jpj https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/74PgSu6iL2s Then one of his friends (or Circlers) starts plussing me into posts of animated cat gifs : https://plus.google.com/u/0/107120198886093172821/posts/gRW9JhWLs5T Don't get me wrong, I'm all about sarcasm and messing with people, but this seems sort of childish to me. Am I the only one who thinks so? So far I have only blocked people who have overtly spammed a thr...
Comments
Contest rules state that evidence must be scientific, which means it is "objective, valid, reliable and calibrated".
How is any literal interpretation (THAT word is hardly objective in itself) of the Bible going to be "objective" or especially "valid", proven "reliable" and "calibrated". It seems the good creationist has set up a one-sided minitrial in order to collect $20,000.00 (the other party has to put up $10,000.00 also!)