""They [evolutionists] are not stupid people, they are bright, but they are bright enough to know there is no scientific evidence they can give in a minitrial," Mastropaolo said." (Scratching my head. So, he felt confident about putting up the $10,000 because he is counting on the intelligence of the evolutionists not to accept...??? I are cornfuzzled. There is a dissonance here.)
wait a sec.....he demands that the scientific community present evidence, while all he has to do is show faith? From the article:
Contest rules state that evidence must be scientific, which means it is "objective, valid, reliable and calibrated".
How is any literal interpretation (THAT word is hardly objective in itself) of the Bible going to be "objective" or especially "valid", proven "reliable" and "calibrated". It seems the good creationist has set up a one-sided minitrial in order to collect $20,000.00 (the other party has to put up $10,000.00 also!)
So, Minnesota would rather people not be able to advance themselves without the officiating organization paying a fee, first? Do libraries have to pay a fee to lend books? Do documentaries put together by universities have to pay a fee first? If I move into the state and give away old college text books, do I have to pay a fee first? http://www.forbes.com/sites/evapereira/2012/10/19/minnesota-bans-free-online-education/
Are you a terrorist? http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/saudi-arabia-declares-all-atheists-are-terrorists-in-new-law-to-crack-down-on-political-dissidents-9228389.html
Comments
Contest rules state that evidence must be scientific, which means it is "objective, valid, reliable and calibrated".
How is any literal interpretation (THAT word is hardly objective in itself) of the Bible going to be "objective" or especially "valid", proven "reliable" and "calibrated". It seems the good creationist has set up a one-sided minitrial in order to collect $20,000.00 (the other party has to put up $10,000.00 also!)