That word is definitely not valueless. Hell, I think you win Scrabble if you use this one.
That word is definitely not valueless. Hell, I think you win Scrabble if you use this one.
http://dictionary.reference.com/wordoftheday/archive/2015/06/04.html
http://dictionary.reference.com/wordoftheday/archive/2015/06/04.html
Comments
in the sense of being worthless or in the sense of being objective?
"Value" has different meanings
I'm.not sure what an objective value would be.
Science is value-less because its based on objective measurements.
Science is valuable because of what it produces.
Pure Science is also a value, because knowledge is worth pursuing for its own sake
You can disagree with the dictionary, but its merely a semantic argument, one that is valueless because it doesn't touch on the actual meaning ( values assigned ) of the words
Sciencenisnt valueless because it uses objectivity in measurements.
Oh NO?
Look up Humes Guillotine
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Is%E2%80%93ought_problem
Science is a process and that process holds value.
Are you agreeing with me or disagreeing with me ? because I already said that.
"Pure Science is also a value, because knowledge is worth pursuing for its own sake"
"Science is also a collective in various fields of study which also hold value to society"
I said that already too ...
"Science is valuable because of what it produces."
Jason ON The word "value" has different meanings. Thats why I asked which one(s) floccinaucinihilipilification. applied to.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/values