Google has oogles of money -- politicians are available to the highest bidder. Where is the money going?
Google has oogles of money -- politicians are available to the highest bidder. Where is the money going?
Originally shared by Violet Blue
This is troubling. You'll want to read it.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57497843-38/where-google-spends-its-pac-money-on-capitol-hill/
The reps getting contributions are pro-warrantless wiretapping, some are staunchly anti-net neutrality - and you'll see, that's not all. What I didn't include is that all of the Republican recipients are staunchly pro-life and against gay marriage.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57497843-38/where-google-spends-its-pac-money-on-capitol-hill/
Originally shared by Violet Blue
This is troubling. You'll want to read it.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57497843-38/where-google-spends-its-pac-money-on-capitol-hill/
The reps getting contributions are pro-warrantless wiretapping, some are staunchly anti-net neutrality - and you'll see, that's not all. What I didn't include is that all of the Republican recipients are staunchly pro-life and against gay marriage.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57497843-38/where-google-spends-its-pac-money-on-capitol-hill/
Comments
Checking sources is something every responsible reader should be doing. Otherwise you're just a sheep getting spoon fed anything you read on the internet.
Besides it's a completely pointless article.
Oh, and you check the sources to verify the sources are accurate. If you want to argue the sources Violet Blue used in her article, that's fine, but that doesn't mean you then get to call her names. And what does it matter that she uses an iPhone? Are you telling me that because I'm typing this on a HP laptop I cannot write an article about Dell? Talk about not making sense.
The idea of saying Google is bad for giving money to these filthy politicians whose stance on any matter only depends on who is lining their pockets is absurd. Nearly all the politicians in Washington are crooked and will sway their votes based on $$$ & there is no validity here.
Don't worry tho you won't see me around these parts any more.
And, Drew Dauffenbach, you may not have overtly called Violet Blue a name, you did call her a fraud in your rebuttle of her "about the author" background.
"Credibility!" That's the other word I couldn't think of. He went after her credibility, which is also a fallacy of logic and reason.