I'm not a fan of having conversations near eavesdroppers.
I'm not a fan of having conversations near eavesdroppers. So much so that I will go for a walk or step into an empty room if I thought my privacy might be compromised.
That being said, the article asks the right question: how much more innovation might exist if powerful companies didn't stymie innovation in an effort to protect themselves?
One can make the argument that such protections urge innovation by others but really, is "slide to unlock" or "rounded edges" something that needs to be defended in court?
http://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/the-battle-over-net-neutrality-started-with-the-1920s-era-hushaphone?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=atlas-page&_utm_source=1-2-2
That being said, the article asks the right question: how much more innovation might exist if powerful companies didn't stymie innovation in an effort to protect themselves?
One can make the argument that such protections urge innovation by others but really, is "slide to unlock" or "rounded edges" something that needs to be defended in court?
http://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/the-battle-over-net-neutrality-started-with-the-1920s-era-hushaphone?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=atlas-page&_utm_source=1-2-2
Comments