So, I asked Andrew Tamm, who filled my Stream with a hundred (sarcasm there) animated gifs and cat pictures to remove me from whatever Circle he has me in where he posts the animated gifs and cat pictures. It was either that or unfollow him and I didn't see any reason to unfollow him. Me asking https://plus.google.com/112885755521259735422/posts/78dwnvvgh4p Then he plusses me onto Public posts of animated cat gifs : https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/EuuR1tnU3vJ https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/8r6Grcm2Jpj https://plus.google.com/u/0/112885755521259735422/posts/74PgSu6iL2s Then one of his friends (or Circlers) starts plussing me into posts of animated cat gifs : https://plus.google.com/u/0/107120198886093172821/posts/gRW9JhWLs5T Don't get me wrong, I'm all about sarcasm and messing with people, but this seems sort of childish to me. Am I the only one who thinks so? So far I have only blocked people who have overtly spammed a thr...
Comments
Objectification is a notion central to feminist theory. It can be roughlydefined as the seeing and/or treating a person, usually a woman, as an object. In this entry, the focus is primarily on sexual objectification, objectificationoccurring in the sexual realm.
Sexism
prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex.
Not, I'm petty sure I now the difference.
It's also why I can instantly dismiss anyone who uses the term 'reverse sexism' … that's not a thing.
Gender parity is not gender equality?
*par·i·ty1
ˈperədē/
noun
1.
the state or condition of being equal, especially regarding status or pay.*
Seems like gender parity would, indeed, be gender equality.
Children understand this moral clarity reflexively.
Adults, apparently, pretend not to know it.