In Hobby Lobby the SCotUS should have sided on the separation of church and state and not chosen the side of...
In Hobby Lobby the SCotUS should have sided on the separation of church and state and not chosen the side of religious ideals overriding the law of the land.
http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/hobby-lobbys-troubling-aftermath
http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/hobby-lobbys-troubling-aftermath
Comments
With Hobby Lobby the Court personal religious belief is paramount over the law of the land. They decided that a company has a right to inflict it's religious beliefs on others who may not share those ideologies. They chose a family's religious concerns over the secular law. If that's not a violation of the establishment clause, I don't know what it. The court, the legislature the executive shouldn't be picking and choosing it's favorites when it comes to religion.
When you claim the media lies, you mean Fox News, right? Most media misinforms or puts a shiny happy screen over everything, it's only Fox News that outright lies.
And you completely miss what is going on in the hobby lobby case and what the constitution actually says. There is a Clinton Era law in place that is the core of this. If, IF you can explain it and why you think it doesn't apply, I will discuss this further. Otherwise I am pis sing into deliberately uninformed wind.
Actually, I get more researchable facts from fox than CNN or msnbc (and more from smaller outlets than either)