The only thing I really see that's better than Facebook is improved privacy settings that are easier to understand. But people don't care that much about privacy enough except when something bad happens.
I hope so, Ryan - but I am not so sure. I showed +1 to a colleague and her initial response was: "Well, that is just a Facebook-clone. Google will probably get sued for this"...
I wouldn't call it a facebook clone, anymore than facebook is a myspace clone. and I don;t think facebook is going to be deserted as soon as google plus opens up to the puplic either. It is just going to change the landscape, up the hustle on everyone's part.
If I can't be bothered to understand half of its features then it seems to me unlikely that most non-technical people will bother to either. For example I know most of them are blissfully unaware that they are sharing stuff publicly for the most part.
Twitter on the other hand is dead simple and that's why I think it is the more popular service for professionals in various circles.
That's the problem with all of these places G+ included. People don't need more than one or two "homes" on the web. As Robert Scoble says about his wife, Facebook is everything most people need and they will stay there because that's where their network already is. Other services can grow by inserting themselves into the faces of new users with less commitment to Facebook and Twitter or through their technology (see Android phones) or to people who choose to leave the main services for various reasons. No matter how good G+ is, Google really have their work cut out for them.
So far, i'm digging it. The only think G+ lacks I can point to is event management. As someone who plans shows, facebook is huge in this arena. If G+ can get events down, they may have something viable as a complete alternative.
Honestly, I don't want the massive migration from FB to G+. It's sure to happen, but not for a while. I don't see why anyone with a gmail account won't be privvy to this once its open, but then again I don't see why anyone still has a yahoo account either. Until it explodes, I think G+ will be exclusive to tech savvy folks & hipsters. Lol
I am interested in the api wich will be key. face it twitter only got big because of great third party applications if google opens all the way with api who knows what type if interesting applications will evolve !
They got blasted enough as they should have for wave and buzz. But all in all this is pretty good. Seems like the best of twitter and Facebook, with some interesting extras thrown in.
So, Minnesota would rather people not be able to advance themselves without the officiating organization paying a fee, first? Do libraries have to pay a fee to lend books? Do documentaries put together by universities have to pay a fee first? If I move into the state and give away old college text books, do I have to pay a fee first? http://www.forbes.com/sites/evapereira/2012/10/19/minnesota-bans-free-online-education/
Are you a terrorist? http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/saudi-arabia-declares-all-atheists-are-terrorists-in-new-law-to-crack-down-on-political-dissidents-9228389.html
Comments
If I can't be bothered to understand half of its features then it seems to me unlikely that most non-technical people will bother to either. For example I know most of them are blissfully unaware that they are sharing stuff publicly for the most part.
Twitter on the other hand is dead simple and that's why I think it is the more popular service for professionals in various circles.